The 2022 FIFA World Cup is just around the corner, and the world is leaning towards the buzz for the first-ever Mundial to be held in the MENA region. The tournament would feature five African representatives, and many are critical of what to expect from these five flag-bearers.
Stay with me for a brief on how Africa´s reps are shaping preparations for the world´s biggest sporting tournament.
It seemed a mirage until we lived the moments of the 2020/21 Ghana Premier League. For the first time in four (4) years, the West African football nation organised a competitive football season and saw it through to the end. Though largely successful, I would deny myself being the sole judge on this matter (of success) and instead state my opinion without twists.
In the Ghanaian sense, and as reasonable as it may sound, a season can only be termed successful when a new football campaign has kicked off without disruption to the football calendar due to legal disputes. To a more significant extent, many followers of the Ghana League have little or no room for legal tussles. In their books, a season with many disciplinary issues to its credit would not make good memories. Talk about disputes on Ghana’s domestic football scene has become more prominent than before due to one primary reason; A match-fixing case is currently being investigated by the Ghana Football Association against two premier league clubs, AshGold Sporting Club and Inter Allies Football Club.
On Saturday, July 17, 2021, the match between the two sides was played on the final week of the league – day 34 – and drew global attention after a player of Inter Allies scored an own goal at the Obuasi Len Clay Stadium, AshGold’s home venue. In his defence, he attempted to alter the predicted score, rumoured ahead of the game.
GHANA FA REACTS TO SAVE ITS REPUTATION AND PUBLIC TRUST.
The Ghana FA Issues a statement commencing sporting investigations – on July 17 and followed by an invitation and collaboration with Ghana Police for Criminal Investigations on July 23. Invites several players and club officials to assist with investigations, freezing the transfer of all players and officials involved on match day. Between August 18 and September 9, 2021, the GFA Prosecutor officially charged the clubs, 36 players, and 12 officials (including AshGold President & CEO) and allowed for defence statements.
Three months later, the 2021/22 Ghana Premier League season is set to commence on October 30, 2021. 18 Premier League clubs again go at each other for the silverware, continental representation, GHC 250000, and bragging rights. Without a doubt, and in one voice, there’s a general call for the football association to “take action” to avoid putting the season’s calendar into disarray. Of course, it would be very satisfying to the ear to learn the Disciplinary Committee of the FA has done so in real time.
In simple language, the average Ghanaian has become more interested in the Ghanaian football season than before and, as expected, decided to bring back the love for Ghana football, and nothing must stall this progress. More importantly, corporate Ghana is keenly monitoring as it could swing the pendulum on potential sponsorships for the Association. On the contrary, I beg to say that there are a few reasons why this pressure to act would be on hold despite the FA’s seeming energy to crack down on match-fixing and protect the sanity of the sport. The system yearns for scapegoats; however, if lawbreakers must be fished out and punished, it must be done within the remits of the law.
• The audi alteram partem rule must be respected – All parties involved must be duly given the right to a fair hearing before any decisions are released. It would be unfair, in the interest of integrity and protecting the reputation of the FA, to prematurely decide on the matter. Let me use Dr Bently’s biblical grounds in the case of R V University of Cambridge (1723)….. “Even God himself did not pass sentence upon Adam before he was called upon to make his defence.” Innocent until proven guilty, the accused deserves to be heard and given a fair hearing. It is not just about banning officials or demoting a club, and players are involved. I fully stand for cleansing our game if it has such dark spots. Regardless we must tread cautiously when determining the future of individuals and their source of living. Our beloved Association must get the ruling right. Do not play to the gallery.
• A contravention of natural justice only leads to making the water murkier -Perhaps we can borrow the legal principles from Hearts of Oak v. Ghana Football Association (1982) where an application for an order of interim injunction to restrain the GFA was secured. Indeed, the courts denied themselves from delving into the matters of the FA and did not stultify its rights to maintain discipline in football. However, it did grant “an injunction for a limited period to enable the GFA institute a proper judicial inquiry into the occurrences… and take whatever action they deemed fit”.
Years ago, Accra Great Olympics – a Ghana premier league club- earned notoriety for legal proceedings against the Football Association or fellow league clubs. In recent times, Tema Youth seems to be leading the log for litigation and makes legal sense once they deem it necessary within the regulations. Essentially, – on behalf of the Ghanaian football stakeholder – the football ecosystem is tired and weary of injunctions and threats that have the potency to cause chaos. Legal counsel for any affected member who feels foul of the law would undoubtedly exercise all legal options available to me until the end. The judicial bodies of the Football Association must be ready and aware of this. Any offender would not go down quickly and aptly demands why such a case – which looks sure to become a stare decisis for Ghanaian football jurisprudence- must be well done.
There’s little reason to doubt the experts at the helm of affairs. I admire their intelligence and understanding of the law; however, this is a delicate one, and there must be little or no room for errors. Playing the devil’s advocate, they may be under pressure to “perform and lash out”. Perhaps it is the failure of the media to educate our football-loving fans that starting the league with an unsettled dispute is not a new phenomenon, even globally. While it is not new, we can only proceed with temporary decisions if there’s satisfactory evidence; otherwise, it casts no slur on our league if we must travel full length to unravel this misery. I beg to ask, are the media handicapped in knowledge?
MATCH-FIXING CASES: A reasonable time is essential for sound legal decisions. All over the world, match-fixing cases have been concluded on sound legal judgments and laws. Briefly enumerated below are three legal precedents in different jurisdictions. In these, the following similarities are established; 1. The accused exercise their right to appeal. 2. Cases never reached a full conclusion until after two years. 3. Appeal beyond the football circle to the Court of Arbitration for Sports. 4. Attempt to exhaust all possible legal remedies, including the Swiss Federal Tribunal. 5. Preliminary Investigations were only released after three months leading to prior sanctions on individuals. (Clubs later suffered full sanctions where applicable). 6. Criminal Investigations are the state’s prerogative, but the national federations always exercise their right to hand out Sporting sanctions.
The Turkey Betting Scandal – Fernabache Sporting Club 
A. Fenerbahçe Spor Kulübü is a professional football club based in Istanbul and a member of the Turkish Football Federation (TFF). Between February 21 to May 15, 2011, in some football games in the Turkish “Süper Lig,” various people around Fenerbahçe were paid bribes to lose the game. They later won the league and qualified for UEFA Champions League. On July 3, 201, police arrested 61 people in a broad criminal investigation concerning match-fixing in Turkish football. In its decisions of September 9 and November 3, 2011, under an appeal by Fenerbahçe against the decision of the TFF arbitration commission of August 25, 2011, the CAS rejected the applications for provisional remedies. On April 26, 2012, the TFF Ethics Committee released the report of an investigation into the charges that various football games had been manipulated, among others, those in which Fenerbahçe participated.
On July 2, 2012, the High Criminal Court in Istanbul held that a criminal organisation had been created under the leadership of the president of Fenerbahçe and that officials of Fenerbahçe had participated in manipulating 13 games of the 2010/2011 season. 48 persons were found guilty; the president of Fenerbahçe 2.5 years imprisonment for building a criminal organisation, 3 years and nine months, and a fine for match-fixing; the vice president of Fenerbahçe and 2 other management board members faced a minimum of 26 months imprisonment for participating in a criminal organisation and match-fixing activities. And on June 22, 2013, the Control and Disciplinary Body of UEFA excluded Fenerbahçe from the following 3 UEFA competitions. Case exhausted all legal remedies on October 16, 2014, at the First Civil Law Court of the Swiss Federal Tribunal.
B. The Boniface case of the Zambia Football Association
• Incidents of match-fixing took place between 2010 and 2012 and were officially documented for match-fixing in 2017. The Zambian National u23 team was used for matches of convenience, and subsequently, a verdict was released in 2019 and ended after an appeal at CAS in July 2020.
C. The Football Federation of Ukraine via the Control and Disciplinary Committee
In 2010, a verdict was released on players and officials of Metalist FC, a Ukrainian club. Match-fixing, own goal, players and officials involved in a match played in 2008. A ban was released after 2 years of investigation in 2010. Ban was appealed at the Football Federation of Ukraine (FFU)Appeal level. There were further appeals at CAS, and decision was upheld. Appellant, still not satisfied, went on to fight at the SWISS Federal Tribunal against the grounds on which evidence was acquired. The case was finally put to bed in 2014.
The message is quite clear. The GFA must not sacrifice legal reasoning for social pressure. Facing the Fixers demands tactfulness and sufficient intelligence. A ruling which stands the test of time is what this current atmosphere needs. And, of course, if it bothers on demotion or promotion of any of the parties involved, good legal decisions often leave no room for ambiguity and always maintain sanity and order.
A DARK HISTORY
After six months of sporting investigations, the GFA, on September 24, 2007, handed transfer bans to 22 players who directly took part in a match-fixing scandal. Okwahu United, Nania FC, Great Mariners, and Mighty Jets were fined a total of GHC 20,000 and suffered a one-year ban from all leagues, events, and activities of the GFA.
In June 2018, a football documentary dubbed Number 12 sought to highlight the level of corruption in football and among football administrators in Ghana. It gained international eyebrows and reduced Ghana’s pride among its international counterparts. On October 25, 2019, FIFA, through the Normalization Committee, ushered Ghana Football into a new era.
It is inherent for this new administration to steer away from the past and present a new image. For this reason, match-fixing must not gain ground as all caught in this web must dance to the music of the law without mercy. It is essential to uphold our values and protect the integrity of our sport. Gracias.
The island of saints and scholars is as redundant a phrase as any other Irish cliche we choose to perpetuate. That being said, the nation’s reputation for religious devotion and high levels of literacy wasn’t fabricated by the geniuses at Carrolls Irish Gift Store. It was once true. For it to be true again, however, your command of the month coinníolach can’t help you. Modh coinníolach, mo problems.
A whole new tongue – the language of computers – will be what separates the educated from the ignorant masses of tomorrow. Understanding how to write code for computers is already becoming one of the most highly prized skill sets anyone can have in the global economy. Here’s why:
All major tech companies, from Google to Facebook, aggressively compete to hire gifted young coders. In the Silicon Valley area, for example, some reports suggest engineering graduates from Stanford University expect their starting salary to be nothing less than $100,000-120,000.
“It’s fair to say that for school-leavers looking to maximise their potential income, few other skills open the door to as many well-paying and varied careers,” says Prof Rory O’Connor, head of the school of computing at Dublin City University.
Coding bridges the universal divide. It is the one language that connects different nationalities and countries. We live in trying times and are pummeled.
Zahid Smith
Programming is still in its infancy. In fact, two of the very first programming languages ever invented are still being used today: Fortran (developed in 1957) and Cobol. “This does not mean that we are using old technology,” says Josue Balandrano Coronel from the Texas advanced computing centre at the University of Texas at Austin. “Those programming languages are being used in very narrow contexts. Even so, this shows us programming has barely started on its own evolutionary path.
Ne mei graeco salutandi, causae assueverit ei sea. Vel noster atomorum ad. Ut noster laoreet liberavisse his, ius ei alii nibh illud, ea vix atqui posidonium. Diam sale id nec, cum sumo sonet ad. Vim eu posse singulis, viris democritum inciderint vis eu. Est audiam commune accommodare et, cum id alienum inciderint, ne animal salutandi ius. Etiam nominavi has ad. Ut vel purto populo. Modus repudiandae cu vix, qui congue splendide adolescens id.
Et his lobortis mnesarchum. Ipsum delicata constituam in eam, id impetus repudiandae nam. Ne graece audire albucius sea, ocurreret efficiantur cu vel. In eum alia consul deleniti, ex pri inermis epicuri percipitur. Ut vide porro explicari est, lucilius mnesarchum cu eum. Nostrud detracto temporibus an ius, eu epicurei comprehensam vim. Et habeo fabulas forensibus ius, ad pertinacia dissentiet per. Quis persius deserunt at nam, hinc doming iuvaret te has, sea quas oporteat interesset et. Mel ad labores offendit officiis, an legere intellegebat nam. Dolor prompta consequuntur eam ne.
Mei vocent ornatus cu, eos et tation volumus imperdiet. Vidit vivendo torquatos his ei, indoctum deseruisse qui et. Ei tota intellegam per. An vim nihil fabellas, eam ridens sensibus ut. Te mel impetus legimus reprehendunt. Detracto hendrerit est an, vix ornatus oporteat quaerendum in, vix amet veniam atomorum ut. Odio suas quaerendum no qui, qui libris corrumpit ei, ne nam case quas. Vel rationibus scripserit ut. Ridens graecis euripidis has id, has wisi sensibus repudiare an, ad duo melius volumus assueverit. In pri aeque moderatius. Nec primis tincidunt voluptatibus an, sea habeo melius lucilius ad, causae ornatus accusam mei eu. Mea ut labore percipit, vim an meis integre singulis.
Id duo nostrud accusam moderatius. Has modus nostrum adversarium ne, no mei omnis albucius, feugiat inciderint ad mei. Fugit paulo persequeris et his. Veri paulo ne est. Ad qui mutat novum primis, an fabulas verterem qui. Usu sumo petentium in, per ex suas oblique comprehensam. Oportere pericula ad pri. No mel nullam detracto intellegat, id legimus docendi consequat vim, per ad epicuri appetere ullamcorper. Antiopam prodesset vel an, ex agam mutat sed.